Professor fortress: institute is “a copycat.”
Posted by admin on September 2nd, 2010“Compared to the media on the discussion, individual standpoint of learning resources with the administration, in fact is the biggest MingHuoZhiZhang ‘a copycat.”
Some “of the” declaration of professor will continuously ShengCaiZhiDao as “, “as some people make a million, and the furniture of false invoices with” academic funds “home,” who would like to do SIMS is forced out? People.”
Psychological roller coaster
“I yesterday, I would have level project, today no project, level decreased, I wasn’t the same for me?”
53 HuXueWen is a university professor, southeast of bo with envy, associate professor, “title”. But so many years, he seems to have been trapped in an unseen siege.
Only the roll-out of professor’s qualification authentication, makes him enough anxiety, until retirement, his mind.
If the project next year, associate professor of concluding his will disqualify a year, “associate professor, must bear a national social science fund project.” He had to rack his brains to find an amulet – “two years.” the concluding
He retired from his contemplating, another five years, if can apply for a project, and can keep the treatment to associate professor emeritus, If the application is not, is “normal” downgraded professor.
There are provisions; do with project, entitled to apply for new projects, projects, he must be very contradictory, concluding on concluding, on the one hand and looking forward to make project extension.
Associate professor, professor more than 50,000 yuan each year average wage. If you lose your qualifications, associate professor of wages, and loss of face except. He had once was demoted psychology “roller coaster”.
Because once bear 1990 national social science fund projects, in 2004, he was appointed “associate professor.” The old school policy has changed, the project not count, he again into ordinary professor.
In order to regain “charge”, since 2005, every year he apply for social projects, has times his project shortlist “, according to “was named policy, national projects, the province will compensate for a project, but the provincial projects, who walked, he didn’t want to ask, the final returning empty-handed.
Until 2008, he finally got a national projects. But this year, “associate professor of qualification condition again, except for the promotion, a national more bear a provincial or municipal social project, called” one “. Fortunately, he GuoWuGuan ZhanLiuJiang and application to a municipal projects, again was promoted to “associate professor.”
His class popular with the students, scoring in 85, his ci-poetry monographs have become major bibliography, but these are required to undertake, if not insignificant state-level projects is a ticket veto, “yesterday I have projects, I have no project, today, lower level, I wasn’t the same me?”
He felt a school teacher evaluation, like twist screws, the twist, make the teacher cannot persist, “professor,” he felt about when the professor has become more and more difficult, “the school is to project number. This is the ranking of the hardware.
MingHuoZhiZhang “learning officer a copycat.”
Rule is, the principal and the administrative resources institute, some important project, presided over the so-called “heave offering”, actually only nominally, practical is young teachers and students.
In 2008, the “turtle” ZhaoTaoGang into the fortress.
He got Ph.D. From the United States to read, according to the agreement, postdoctoral must assume and post-project a national social science fund projects, otherwise can emerge. Since the end of 2008, he began to worry.
In the national social science GuiHuaBan usually at the end of each year by 23 discipline “, “means the topic guide declaration must be” subject “regulation.
Previous attempts to find ZhaoTao project, he bought a bestseller in the book entitled “out of stock, philosophy and social science, national five-year research situation and development trend of” 11th five-year plan “, the price is $198.
He was confused, some more empty projects, research funding. Many project topics, he could not see anything, for example, a rational price for 50 yuan topic is how to deal with the media.
When the professor for 30 years more clearly HuXueWen of unspoken rule, he saw some administrative resources of the principal and the project, some important when the heave offering, the so-called “power”, actually only nominally, practical is young teachers and students, “discussion on” than media, individual standpoint of administrative resources with the officials, actually is the biggest MingHuoZhiZhang ‘a copycat.”
A professor of philosophy is the translation of a former yugoslav philosophical work, as the “original” directly, this thought is little-used to “encounter” “”, or the defendant.
About plagiarism, national social science press, responsible for an interview within 2 million copies “in the application materials, have individual topic demonstration of experts in more seere plagiarism. In a meeting-based evaluation, also have two copies of the subject though NSFC found different, but the argument and the core content in the same materials”.
Browse the web site over social programs, from the national, provincial, municipal and school-class up to, “suit” between the provinces, social funds trifle. Some questions like “words”, such as “marxist and advance with The Times” and “times of marxism.
ZhaoTao bought the thick book said, foreign literature in the title, “baerzake, Hugo, 1783 stendhal, etc, gianfranco zola maupassant, low level of repetition of not less than 80%.
Some even topics, such as a word about college students’ employment, two research projects in the project, a price 420,000, a 15 million bid for HuXueWen, also called inquired of national social science do differ from each other, “a reply, is a major project, the project is”. He was confused, unclear, “great” and “annual” the judgment standard.
HuXueWen also found that “suit” research, financial crisis to a financial crisis, the sichuan earthquake research to the research in earthquake, the Olympics to study, light wenchuan earthquake games after the reconstruction of the same, there were twenty or thirty, some funds more than 40 million, up as “to go directly to the post-disaster reconstruction.
While some temporary countermeasure, haven’t already today, “as the concluding the taxpayer money, boondoggle.”
ZhaoTao hear several national social science evaluation judges said topic guide, two-thirds of topic is “sit offices of”. One year, a unit of “power” has declared to “guide” great task in the study of deng xiaoping’s ideological, 8 million bid for find relevant materials, especially, the “problem” super became subject.
ZhaoTao found in the guide, “the sinicization of marxist literary yanan leftist writers”, “study” several projects is considerable amount. He noticed the national social science of official explanation: “philosophy social science disciplines, apart from most disciplines has unique ideology attributes.”
He finally chose “individual” subject to change their academic direction too.
The national social science fund also experience for many people never changes: 1985 eyeglasses-reshaping the national social science fund project only 500 yuan, 2009 national social science fund has nearly 4 billion yuan.
National social science fund of social development for the site about gratifying situation: “whether universities generally assume, how the national social science fund project as a measure of the strength of his research yongda.”
National social science fund project only last year, an accepting institution received 14 kinds of materials, including ZhaoTao, plus the provincial level and lower, is an astronomical figures.
According to the Beijing office declared.”
Peking University, fudan university, the National People’s Congress, as a key university and zhejiang university ntu named above, 33 rate can apply to the local colleges and universities is much smaller proportion.
That period, by colleagues describe as “black” ZhaoTao, may the words, the material is enough “terrorist”.
First filing materials cast, he began to have a kind of disorders, decided to imitate others, generally for luck. “,” Every month he “change the appearance” two, or even a throw of the state general administration of sports, but also in the fund appeal remained a dead letter.
Every time he went to KeYanChu shool, found a stack of project application are tall. He thought, big hold, also don’t run, and also on the stack.
He even sees on the net book post, imparting obligation is a post in the decades after the “notes”, do not forget that one, “don’t exclude use other means”.
The lecturer made a year ZhaoTao weekly has three classes, 12 hours, to gather material, time to write his 12 classes to day. Finish the throat are dumb at two o ‘clock in the morning every day, not slept before.
An application is usually 15 pages. Only one topic, should write 5000 to 8,000, “declared project is, do you make it futures as a flower, results may be a heap of shoddy school.”
He is the most nerve-racking, should fill in the declaration form, the “respectively in research, the research significance, the research content”, etc. He showed no difference, but also practical segmentation, racking my brains to balance the distribution of limited to a few words in space, “cast 20, light is 1.2 million declaration.
After the declaration, screening, delivered by name and unit to minnith, assigned to the anonymous judges. This is double anonymous. A project returns by five anonymous scores.
HuXueWen as national 863, sometimes he was doing, often receives various anonymous phone book “.
He declared himself in 2008, when everyone on the phone, a relationship, to despise, but in which can produce a kind of fear. Once, he attended a national conference, met in the list of professor, expert pool half jokingly dozen hello: “please matters. Afterwards just know, he is not relevant.
By 2010, for example, has 5362 anonymous judges like looking for a needle in a haystack. Ask anonymous judges
Anonymous judges over piles of materials is hard, “polite”, are’s so full of books in the collective and individual chapters, besides, most “scissors-and-paste job.” Though sometimes anonymous judges, playing some lower points, but will give “through”, is the circle, turn a blind eye.
The judges had a anonymous, project shortlist “is”. This brush down 80% applicants. This year, for example, by the national social science fund project of 27171 declaration, 4652 finalists, rate of.
Next round, the final review meeting is convened by the discipline group, 280 meeting voting and judges vote. Meeting Finally, after approval by leading group formally 2285 applications. Project 8.42% rate. This round brush down again.
Recent Comments